代码拉取完成，页面将自动刷新
Open vSwitch <http://openvswitch.org>
Frequently Asked Questions
==========================
General
-------
Q: What is Open vSwitch?
A: Open vSwitch is a production quality open source software switch
designed to be used as a vswitch in virtualized server
environments. A vswitch forwards traffic between different VMs on
the same physical host and also forwards traffic between VMs and
the physical network. Open vSwitch supports standard management
interfaces (e.g. sFlow, NetFlow, IPFIX, RSPAN, CLI), and is open to
programmatic extension and control using OpenFlow and the OVSDB
management protocol.
Open vSwitch as designed to be compatible with modern switching
chipsets. This means that it can be ported to existing high-fanout
switches allowing the same flexible control of the physical
infrastructure as the virtual infrastructure. It also means that
Open vSwitch will be able to take advantage of on-NIC switching
chipsets as their functionality matures.
Q: What virtualization platforms can use Open vSwitch?
A: Open vSwitch can currently run on any Linux-based virtualization
platform (kernel 2.6.32 and newer), including: KVM, VirtualBox, Xen,
Xen Cloud Platform, XenServer. As of Linux 3.3 it is part of the
mainline kernel. The bulk of the code is written in platform-
independent C and is easily ported to other environments. We welcome
inquires about integrating Open vSwitch with other virtualization
platforms.
Q: How can I try Open vSwitch?
A: The Open vSwitch source code can be built on a Linux system. You can
build and experiment with Open vSwitch on any Linux machine.
Packages for various Linux distributions are available on many
platforms, including: Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora.
You may also download and run a virtualization platform that already
has Open vSwitch integrated. For example, download a recent ISO for
XenServer or Xen Cloud Platform. Be aware that the version
integrated with a particular platform may not be the most recent Open
vSwitch release.
Q: Does Open vSwitch only work on Linux?
A: No, Open vSwitch has been ported to a number of different operating
systems and hardware platforms. Most of the development work occurs
on Linux, but the code should be portable to any POSIX system. We've
seen Open vSwitch ported to a number of different platforms,
including FreeBSD, Windows, and even non-POSIX embedded systems.
By definition, the Open vSwitch Linux kernel module only works on
Linux and will provide the highest performance. However, a userspace
datapath is available that should be very portable.
Q: What's involved with porting Open vSwitch to a new platform or
switching ASIC?
A: The PORTING document describes how one would go about porting Open
vSwitch to a new operating system or hardware platform.
Q: Why would I use Open vSwitch instead of the Linux bridge?
A: Open vSwitch is specially designed to make it easier to manage VM
network configuration and monitor state spread across many physical
hosts in dynamic virtualized environments. Please see WHY-OVS for a
more detailed description of how Open vSwitch relates to the Linux
Bridge.
Q: How is Open vSwitch related to distributed virtual switches like the
VMware vNetwork distributed switch or the Cisco Nexus 1000V?
A: Distributed vswitch applications (e.g., VMware vNetwork distributed
switch, Cisco Nexus 1000V) provide a centralized way to configure and
monitor the network state of VMs that are spread across many physical
hosts. Open vSwitch is not a distributed vswitch itself, rather it
runs on each physical host and supports remote management in a way
that makes it easier for developers of virtualization/cloud
management platforms to offer distributed vswitch capabilities.
To aid in distribution, Open vSwitch provides two open protocols that
are specially designed for remote management in virtualized network
environments: OpenFlow, which exposes flow-based forwarding state,
and the OVSDB management protocol, which exposes switch port state.
In addition to the switch implementation itself, Open vSwitch
includes tools (ovs-ofctl, ovs-vsctl) that developers can script and
extend to provide distributed vswitch capabilities that are closely
integrated with their virtualization management platform.
Q: Why doesn't Open vSwitch support distribution?
A: Open vSwitch is intended to be a useful component for building
flexible network infrastructure. There are many different approaches
to distribution which balance trade-offs between simplicity,
scalability, hardware compatibility, convergence times, logical
forwarding model, etc. The goal of Open vSwitch is to be able to
support all as a primitive building block rather than choose a
particular point in the distributed design space.
Q: How can I contribute to the Open vSwitch Community?
A: You can start by joining the mailing lists and helping to answer
questions. You can also suggest improvements to documentation. If
you have a feature or bug you would like to work on, send a mail to
one of the mailing lists:
http://openvswitch.org/mlists/
Releases
--------
Q: What does it mean for an Open vSwitch release to be LTS (long-term
support)?
A: All official releases have been through a comprehensive testing
process and are suitable for production use. Planned releases will
occur several times a year. If a significant bug is identified in an
LTS release, we will provide an updated release that includes the
fix. Releases that are not LTS may not be fixed and may just be
supplanted by the next major release. The current LTS release is
1.9.x.
Q: What Linux kernel versions does each Open vSwitch release work with?
A: The following table lists the Linux kernel versions against which the
given versions of the Open vSwitch kernel module will successfully
build. The Linux kernel versions are upstream kernel versions, so
Linux kernels modified from the upstream sources may not build in
some cases even if they are based on a supported version. This is
most notably true of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) kernels, which
are extensively modified from upstream.
Open vSwitch Linux kernel
------------ -------------
1.4.x 2.6.18 to 3.2
1.5.x 2.6.18 to 3.2
1.6.x 2.6.18 to 3.2
1.7.x 2.6.18 to 3.3
1.8.x 2.6.18 to 3.4
1.9.x 2.6.18 to 3.8
1.10.x 2.6.18 to 3.8
1.11.x 2.6.18 to 3.8
2.0.x 2.6.32 to 3.10
2.1.x 2.6.32 to 3.11
2.2.x 2.6.32 to 3.14
Open vSwitch userspace should also work with the Linux kernel module
built into Linux 3.3 and later.
Open vSwitch userspace is not sensitive to the Linux kernel version.
It should build against almost any kernel, certainly against 2.6.32
and later.
Q: I get an error like this when I configure Open vSwitch:
configure: error: Linux kernel in <dir> is version <x>, but
version newer than <y> is not supported (please refer to the
FAQ for advice)
What should I do?
A: If there is a newer version of Open vSwitch, consider building that
one, because it may support the kernel that you are building
against. (To find out, consult the table in the previous answer.)
Otherwise, use the Linux kernel module supplied with the kernel
that you are using. All versions of Open vSwitch userspace are
compatible with all versions of the Open vSwitch kernel module, so
this will also work. See also the following question.
Q: What features are not available in the Open vSwitch kernel datapath
that ships as part of the upstream Linux kernel?
A: The kernel module in upstream Linux does not include support for
LISP. Work is in progress to add support for LISP to the upstream
Linux version of the Open vSwitch kernel module. For now, if you
need this feature, use the kernel module from the Open vSwitch
distribution instead of the upstream Linux kernel module.
Certain features require kernel support to function or to have
reasonable performance. If the ovs-vswitchd log file indicates that
a feature is not supported, consider upgrading to a newer upstream
Linux release or using the kernel module paired with the userspace
distribution.
Q: What features are not available when using the userspace datapath?
A: Tunnel virtual ports are not supported, as described in the
previous answer. It is also not possible to use queue-related
actions. On Linux kernels before 2.6.39, maximum-sized VLAN packets
may not be transmitted.
Q: What Linux kernel versions does IPFIX flow monitoring work with?
A: IPFIX flow monitoring requires the Linux kernel module from Open
vSwitch version 1.10.90 or later.
Q: Should userspace or kernel be upgraded first to minimize downtime?
In general, the Open vSwitch userspace should be used with the
kernel version included in the same release or with the version
from upstream Linux. However, when upgrading between two releases
of Open vSwitch it is best to migrate userspace first to reduce
the possibility of incompatibilities.
Q: What happened to the bridge compatibility feature?
A: Bridge compatibility was a feature of Open vSwitch 1.9 and earlier.
When it was enabled, Open vSwitch imitated the interface of the
Linux kernel "bridge" module. This allowed users to drop Open
vSwitch into environments designed to use the Linux kernel bridge
module without adapting the environment to use Open vSwitch.
Open vSwitch 1.10 and later do not support bridge compatibility.
The feature was dropped because version 1.10 adopted a new internal
architecture that made bridge compatibility difficult to maintain.
Now that many environments use OVS directly, it would be rarely
useful in any case.
To use bridge compatibility, install OVS 1.9 or earlier, including
the accompanying kernel modules (both the main and bridge
compatibility modules), following the instructions that come with
the release. Be sure to start the ovs-brcompatd daemon.
Terminology
-----------
Q: I thought Open vSwitch was a virtual Ethernet switch, but the
documentation keeps talking about bridges. What's a bridge?
A: In networking, the terms "bridge" and "switch" are synonyms. Open
vSwitch implements an Ethernet switch, which means that it is also
an Ethernet bridge.
Q: What's a VLAN?
A: See the "VLAN" section below.
Basic Configuration
-------------------
Q: How do I configure a port as an access port?
A: Add "tag=VLAN" to your "ovs-vsctl add-port" command. For example,
the following commands configure br0 with eth0 as a trunk port (the
default) and tap0 as an access port for VLAN 9:
ovs-vsctl add-br br0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 tap0 tag=9
If you want to configure an already added port as an access port,
use "ovs-vsctl set", e.g.:
ovs-vsctl set port tap0 tag=9
Q: How do I configure a port as a SPAN port, that is, enable mirroring
of all traffic to that port?
A: The following commands configure br0 with eth0 and tap0 as trunk
ports. All traffic coming in or going out on eth0 or tap0 is also
mirrored to tap1; any traffic arriving on tap1 is dropped:
ovs-vsctl add-br br0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 tap0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 tap1 \
-- --id=@p get port tap1 \
-- --id=@m create mirror name=m0 select-all=true output-port=@p \
-- set bridge br0 mirrors=@m
To later disable mirroring, run:
ovs-vsctl clear bridge br0 mirrors
Q: Does Open vSwitch support configuring a port in promiscuous mode?
A: Yes. How you configure it depends on what you mean by "promiscuous
mode":
- Conventionally, "promiscuous mode" is a feature of a network
interface card. Ordinarily, a NIC passes to the CPU only the
packets actually destined to its host machine. It discards
the rest to avoid wasting memory and CPU cycles. When
promiscuous mode is enabled, however, it passes every packet
to the CPU. On an old-style shared-media or hub-based
network, this allows the host to spy on all packets on the
network. But in the switched networks that are almost
everywhere these days, promiscuous mode doesn't have much
effect, because few packets not destined to a host are
delivered to the host's NIC.
This form of promiscuous mode is configured in the guest OS of
the VMs on your bridge, e.g. with "ifconfig".
- The VMware vSwitch uses a different definition of "promiscuous
mode". When you configure promiscuous mode on a VMware vNIC,
the vSwitch sends a copy of every packet received by the
vSwitch to that vNIC. That has a much bigger effect than just
enabling promiscuous mode in a guest OS. Rather than getting
a few stray packets for which the switch does not yet know the
correct destination, the vNIC gets every packet. The effect
is similar to replacing the vSwitch by a virtual hub.
This "promiscuous mode" is what switches normally call "port
mirroring" or "SPAN". For information on how to configure
SPAN, see "How do I configure a port as a SPAN port, that is,
enable mirroring of all traffic to that port?"
Q: How do I configure a VLAN as an RSPAN VLAN, that is, enable
mirroring of all traffic to that VLAN?
A: The following commands configure br0 with eth0 as a trunk port and
tap0 as an access port for VLAN 10. All traffic coming in or going
out on tap0, as well as traffic coming in or going out on eth0 in
VLAN 10, is also mirrored to VLAN 15 on eth0. The original tag for
VLAN 10, in cases where one is present, is dropped as part of
mirroring:
ovs-vsctl add-br br0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 tap0 tag=10
ovs-vsctl \
-- --id=@m create mirror name=m0 select-all=true select-vlan=10 \
output-vlan=15 \
-- set bridge br0 mirrors=@m
To later disable mirroring, run:
ovs-vsctl clear bridge br0 mirrors
Mirroring to a VLAN can disrupt a network that contains unmanaged
switches. See ovs-vswitchd.conf.db(5) for details. Mirroring to a
GRE tunnel has fewer caveats than mirroring to a VLAN and should
generally be preferred.
Q: Can I mirror more than one input VLAN to an RSPAN VLAN?
A: Yes, but mirroring to a VLAN strips the original VLAN tag in favor
of the specified output-vlan. This loss of information may make
the mirrored traffic too hard to interpret.
To mirror multiple VLANs, use the commands above, but specify a
comma-separated list of VLANs as the value for select-vlan. To
mirror every VLAN, use the commands above, but omit select-vlan and
its value entirely.
When a packet arrives on a VLAN that is used as a mirror output
VLAN, the mirror is disregarded. Instead, in standalone mode, OVS
floods the packet across all the ports for which the mirror output
VLAN is configured. (If an OpenFlow controller is in use, then it
can override this behavior through the flow table.) If OVS is used
as an intermediate switch, rather than an edge switch, this ensures
that the RSPAN traffic is distributed through the network.
Mirroring to a VLAN can disrupt a network that contains unmanaged
switches. See ovs-vswitchd.conf.db(5) for details. Mirroring to a
GRE tunnel has fewer caveats than mirroring to a VLAN and should
generally be preferred.
Q: How do I configure mirroring of all traffic to a GRE tunnel?
A: The following commands configure br0 with eth0 and tap0 as trunk
ports. All traffic coming in or going out on eth0 or tap0 is also
mirrored to gre0, a GRE tunnel to the remote host 192.168.1.10; any
traffic arriving on gre0 is dropped:
ovs-vsctl add-br br0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 tap0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 gre0 \
-- set interface gre0 type=gre options:remote_ip=192.168.1.10 \
-- --id=@p get port gre0 \
-- --id=@m create mirror name=m0 select-all=true output-port=@p \
-- set bridge br0 mirrors=@m
To later disable mirroring and destroy the GRE tunnel:
ovs-vsctl clear bridge br0 mirrors
ovs-vcstl del-port br0 gre0
Q: Does Open vSwitch support ERSPAN?
A: No. ERSPAN is an undocumented proprietary protocol. As an
alternative, Open vSwitch supports mirroring to a GRE tunnel (see
above).
Q: How do I connect two bridges?
A: First, why do you want to do this? Two connected bridges are not
much different from a single bridge, so you might as well just have
a single bridge with all your ports on it.
If you still want to connect two bridges, you can use a pair of
patch ports. The following example creates bridges br0 and br1,
adds eth0 and tap0 to br0, adds tap1 to br1, and then connects br0
and br1 with a pair of patch ports.
ovs-vsctl add-br br0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 tap0
ovs-vsctl add-br br1
ovs-vsctl add-port br1 tap1
ovs-vsctl \
-- add-port br0 patch0 \
-- set interface patch0 type=patch options:peer=patch1 \
-- add-port br1 patch1 \
-- set interface patch1 type=patch options:peer=patch0
Bridges connected with patch ports are much like a single bridge.
For instance, if the example above also added eth1 to br1, and both
eth0 and eth1 happened to be connected to the same next-hop switch,
then you could loop your network just as you would if you added
eth0 and eth1 to the same bridge (see the "Configuration Problems"
section below for more information).
If you are using Open vSwitch 1.9 or an earlier version, then you
need to be using the kernel module bundled with Open vSwitch rather
than the one that is integrated into Linux 3.3 and later, because
Open vSwitch 1.9 and earlier versions need kernel support for patch
ports. This also means that in Open vSwitch 1.9 and earlier, patch
ports will not work with the userspace datapath, only with the
kernel module.
Q: How do I configure a bridge without an OpenFlow local port?
(Local port in the sense of OFPP_LOCAL)
A: Open vSwitch does not support such a configuration.
Bridges always have their local ports.
Implementation Details
----------------------
Q: I hear OVS has a couple of kinds of flows. Can you tell me about them?
A: Open vSwitch uses different kinds of flows for different purposes:
- OpenFlow flows are the most important kind of flow. OpenFlow
controllers use these flows to define a switch's policy.
OpenFlow flows support wildcards, priorities, and multiple
tables.
When in-band control is in use, Open vSwitch sets up a few
"hidden" flows, with priority higher than a controller or the
user can configure, that are not visible via OpenFlow. (See
the "Controller" section of the FAQ for more information
about hidden flows.)
- The Open vSwitch software switch implementation uses a second
kind of flow internally. These flows, called "datapath" or
"kernel" flows, do not support priorities and comprise only a
single table, which makes them suitable for caching. (Like
OpenFlow flows, datapath flows do support wildcarding, in Open
vSwitch 1.11 and later.) OpenFlow flows and datapath flows
also support different actions and number ports differently.
Datapath flows are an implementation detail that is subject to
change in future versions of Open vSwitch. Even with the
current version of Open vSwitch, hardware switch
implementations do not necessarily use this architecture.
Users and controllers directly control only the OpenFlow flow
table. Open vSwitch manages the datapath flow table itself, so
users should not normally be concerned with it.
Q: Why are there so many different ways to dump flows?
A: Open vSwitch has two kinds of flows (see the previous question), so
it has commands with different purposes for dumping each kind of
flow:
- "ovs-ofctl dump-flows <br>" dumps OpenFlow flows, excluding
hidden flows. This is the most commonly useful form of flow
dump. (Unlike the other commands, this should work with any
OpenFlow switch, not just Open vSwitch.)
- "ovs-appctl bridge/dump-flows <br>" dumps OpenFlow flows,
including hidden flows. This is occasionally useful for
troubleshooting suspected issues with in-band control.
- "ovs-dpctl dump-flows [dp]" dumps the datapath flow table
entries for a Linux kernel-based datapath. In Open vSwitch
1.10 and later, ovs-vswitchd merges multiple switches into a
single datapath, so it will show all the flows on all your
kernel-based switches. This command can occasionally be
useful for debugging.
- "ovs-appctl dpif/dump-flows <br>", new in Open vSwitch 1.10,
dumps datapath flows for only the specified bridge, regardless
of the type.
Performance
-----------
Q: I just upgraded and I see a performance drop. Why?
A: The OVS kernel datapath may have been updated to a newer version than
the OVS userspace components. Sometimes new versions of OVS kernel
module add functionality that is backwards compatible with older
userspace components but may cause a drop in performance with them.
Especially, if a kernel module from OVS 2.1 or newer is paired with
OVS userspace 1.10 or older, there will be a performance drop for
TCP traffic.
Updating the OVS userspace components to the latest released
version should fix the performance degradation.
To get the best possible performance and functionality, it is
recommended to pair the same versions of the kernel module and OVS
userspace.
Configuration Problems
----------------------
Q: I created a bridge and added my Ethernet port to it, using commands
like these:
ovs-vsctl add-br br0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth0
and as soon as I ran the "add-port" command I lost all connectivity
through eth0. Help!
A: A physical Ethernet device that is part of an Open vSwitch bridge
should not have an IP address. If one does, then that IP address
will not be fully functional.
You can restore functionality by moving the IP address to an Open
vSwitch "internal" device, such as the network device named after
the bridge itself. For example, assuming that eth0's IP address is
192.168.128.5, you could run the commands below to fix up the
situation:
ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0
ifconfig br0 192.168.128.5
(If your only connection to the machine running OVS is through the
IP address in question, then you would want to run all of these
commands on a single command line, or put them into a script.) If
there were any additional routes assigned to eth0, then you would
also want to use commands to adjust these routes to go through br0.
If you use DHCP to obtain an IP address, then you should kill the
DHCP client that was listening on the physical Ethernet interface
(e.g. eth0) and start one listening on the internal interface
(e.g. br0). You might still need to manually clear the IP address
from the physical interface (e.g. with "ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0").
There is no compelling reason why Open vSwitch must work this way.
However, this is the way that the Linux kernel bridge module has
always worked, so it's a model that those accustomed to Linux
bridging are already used to. Also, the model that most people
expect is not implementable without kernel changes on all the
versions of Linux that Open vSwitch supports.
By the way, this issue is not specific to physical Ethernet
devices. It applies to all network devices except Open vswitch
"internal" devices.
Q: I created a bridge and added a couple of Ethernet ports to it,
using commands like these:
ovs-vsctl add-br br0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth1
and now my network seems to have melted: connectivity is unreliable
(even connectivity that doesn't go through Open vSwitch), all the
LEDs on my physical switches are blinking, wireshark shows
duplicated packets, and CPU usage is very high.
A: More than likely, you've looped your network. Probably, eth0 and
eth1 are connected to the same physical Ethernet switch. This
yields a scenario where OVS receives a broadcast packet on eth0 and
sends it out on eth1, then the physical switch connected to eth1
sends the packet back on eth0, and so on forever. More complicated
scenarios, involving a loop through multiple switches, are possible
too.
The solution depends on what you are trying to do:
- If you added eth0 and eth1 to get higher bandwidth or higher
reliability between OVS and your physical Ethernet switch,
use a bond. The following commands create br0 and then add
eth0 and eth1 as a bond:
ovs-vsctl add-br br0
ovs-vsctl add-bond br0 bond0 eth0 eth1
Bonds have tons of configuration options. Please read the
documentation on the Port table in ovs-vswitchd.conf.db(5)
for all the details.
- Perhaps you don't actually need eth0 and eth1 to be on the
same bridge. For example, if you simply want to be able to
connect each of them to virtual machines, then you can put
each of them on a bridge of its own:
ovs-vsctl add-br br0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth0
ovs-vsctl add-br br1
ovs-vsctl add-port br1 eth1
and then connect VMs to br0 and br1. (A potential
disadvantage is that traffic cannot directly pass between br0
and br1. Instead, it will go out eth0 and come back in eth1,
or vice versa.)
- If you have a redundant or complex network topology and you
want to prevent loops, turn on spanning tree protocol (STP).
The following commands create br0, enable STP, and add eth0
and eth1 to the bridge. The order is important because you
don't want have to have a loop in your network even
transiently:
ovs-vsctl add-br br0
ovs-vsctl set bridge br0 stp_enable=true
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth1
The Open vSwitch implementation of STP is not well tested.
Please report any bugs you observe, but if you'd rather avoid
acting as a beta tester then another option might be your
best shot.
Q: I can't seem to use Open vSwitch in a wireless network.
A: Wireless base stations generally only allow packets with the source
MAC address of NIC that completed the initial handshake.
Therefore, without MAC rewriting, only a single device can
communicate over a single wireless link.
This isn't specific to Open vSwitch, it's enforced by the access
point, so the same problems will show up with the Linux bridge or
any other way to do bridging.
Q: I can't seem to add my PPP interface to an Open vSwitch bridge.
A: PPP most commonly carries IP packets, but Open vSwitch works only
with Ethernet frames. The correct way to interface PPP to an
Ethernet network is usually to use routing instead of switching.
Q: Is there any documentation on the database tables and fields?
A: Yes. ovs-vswitchd.conf.db(5) is a comprehensive reference.
Q: When I run ovs-dpctl I no longer see the bridges I created. Instead,
I only see a datapath called "ovs-system". How can I see datapath
information about a particular bridge?
A: In version 1.9.0, OVS switched to using a single datapath that is
shared by all bridges of that type. The "ovs-appctl dpif/*"
commands provide similar functionality that is scoped by the bridge.
Q: I created a GRE port using ovs-vsctl so why can't I send traffic or
see the port in the datapath?
A: On Linux kernels before 3.11, the OVS GRE module and Linux GRE module
cannot be loaded at the same time. It is likely that on your system the
Linux GRE module is already loaded and blocking OVS (to confirm, check
dmesg for errors regarding GRE registration). To fix this, unload all
GRE modules that appear in lsmod as well as the OVS kernel module. You
can then reload the OVS module following the directions in INSTALL,
which will ensure that dependencies are satisfied.
Q: Open vSwitch does not seem to obey my packet filter rules.
A: It depends on mechanisms and configurations you want to use.
You cannot usefully use typical packet filters, like iptables, on
physical Ethernet ports that you add to an Open vSwitch bridge.
This is because Open vSwitch captures packets from the interface at
a layer lower below where typical packet-filter implementations
install their hooks. (This actually applies to any interface of
type "system" that you might add to an Open vSwitch bridge.)
You can usefully use typical packet filters on Open vSwitch
internal ports as they are mostly ordinary interfaces from the point
of view of packet filters.
For example, suppose you create a bridge br0 and add Ethernet port
eth0 to it. Then you can usefully add iptables rules to affect the
internal interface br0, but not the physical interface eth0. (br0
is also where you would add an IP address, as discussed elsewhere
in the FAQ.)
For simple filtering rules, it might be possible to achieve similar
results by installing appropriate OpenFlow flows instead.
If the use of a particular packet filter setup is essential, Open
vSwitch might not be the best choice for you. On Linux, you might
want to consider using the Linux Bridge. (This is the only choice if
you want to use ebtables rules.) On NetBSD, you might want to
consider using the bridge(4) with BRIDGE_IPF option.
Quality of Service (QoS)
------------------------
Q: How do I configure Quality of Service (QoS)?
A: Suppose that you want to set up bridge br0 connected to physical
Ethernet port eth0 (a 1 Gbps device) and virtual machine interfaces
vif1.0 and vif2.0, and that you want to limit traffic from vif1.0
to eth0 to 10 Mbps and from vif2.0 to eth0 to 20 Mbps. Then, you
could configure the bridge this way:
ovs-vsctl -- \
add-br br0 -- \
add-port br0 eth0 -- \
add-port br0 vif1.0 -- set interface vif1.0 ofport_request=5 -- \
add-port br0 vif2.0 -- set interface vif2.0 ofport_request=6 -- \
set port eth0 qos=@newqos -- \
--id=@newqos create qos type=linux-htb \
other-config:max-rate=1000000000 \
queues:123=@vif10queue \
queues:234=@vif20queue -- \
--id=@vif10queue create queue other-config:max-rate=10000000 -- \
--id=@vif20queue create queue other-config:max-rate=20000000
At this point, bridge br0 is configured with the ports and eth0 is
configured with the queues that you need for QoS, but nothing is
actually directing packets from vif1.0 or vif2.0 to the queues that
we have set up for them. That means that all of the packets to
eth0 are going to the "default queue", which is not what we want.
We use OpenFlow to direct packets from vif1.0 and vif2.0 to the
queues reserved for them:
ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 in_port=5,actions=set_queue:123,normal
ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 in_port=6,actions=set_queue:234,normal
Each of the above flows matches on the input port, sets up the
appropriate queue (123 for vif1.0, 234 for vif2.0), and then
executes the "normal" action, which performs the same switching
that Open vSwitch would have done without any OpenFlow flows being
present. (We know that vif1.0 and vif2.0 have OpenFlow port
numbers 5 and 6, respectively, because we set their ofport_request
columns above. If we had not done that, then we would have needed
to find out their port numbers before setting up these flows.)
Now traffic going from vif1.0 or vif2.0 to eth0 should be
rate-limited.
By the way, if you delete the bridge created by the above commands,
with:
ovs-vsctl del-br br0
then that will leave one unreferenced QoS record and two
unreferenced Queue records in the Open vSwich database. One way to
clear them out, assuming you don't have other QoS or Queue records
that you want to keep, is:
ovs-vsctl -- --all destroy QoS -- --all destroy Queue
If you do want to keep some QoS or Queue records, or the Open
vSwitch you are using is older than version 1.8 (which added the
--all option), then you will have to destroy QoS and Queue records
individually.
Q: I configured Quality of Service (QoS) in my OpenFlow network by
adding records to the QoS and Queue table, but the results aren't
what I expect.
A: Did you install OpenFlow flows that use your queues? This is the
primary way to tell Open vSwitch which queues you want to use. If
you don't do this, then the default queue will be used, which will
probably not have the effect you want.
Refer to the previous question for an example.
Q: I'd like to take advantage of some QoS feature that Open vSwitch
doesn't yet support. How do I do that?
A: Open vSwitch does not implement QoS itself. Instead, it can
configure some, but not all, of the QoS features built into the
Linux kernel. If you need some QoS feature that OVS cannot
configure itself, then the first step is to figure out whether
Linux QoS supports that feature. If it does, then you can submit a
patch to support Open vSwitch configuration for that feature, or
you can use "tc" directly to configure the feature in Linux. (If
Linux QoS doesn't support the feature you want, then first you have
to add that support to Linux.)
Q: I configured QoS, correctly, but my measurements show that it isn't
working as well as I expect.
A: With the Linux kernel, the Open vSwitch implementation of QoS has
two aspects:
- Open vSwitch configures a subset of Linux kernel QoS
features, according to what is in OVSDB. It is possible that
this code has bugs. If you believe that this is so, then you
can configure the Linux traffic control (QoS) stack directly
with the "tc" program. If you get better results that way,
you can send a detailed bug report to bugs@openvswitch.org.
It is certain that Open vSwitch cannot configure every Linux
kernel QoS feature. If you need some feature that OVS cannot
configure, then you can also use "tc" directly (or add that
feature to OVS).
- The Open vSwitch implementation of OpenFlow allows flows to
be directed to particular queues. This is pretty simple and
unlikely to have serious bugs at this point.
However, most problems with QoS on Linux are not bugs in Open
vSwitch at all. They tend to be either configuration errors
(please see the earlier questions in this section) or issues with
the traffic control (QoS) stack in Linux. The Open vSwitch
developers are not experts on Linux traffic control. We suggest
that, if you believe you are encountering a problem with Linux
traffic control, that you consult the tc manpages (e.g. tc(8),
tc-htb(8), tc-hfsc(8)), web resources (e.g. http://lartc.org/), or
mailing lists (e.g. http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#netdev).
Q: Does Open vSwitch support OpenFlow meters?
A: Since version 2.0, Open vSwitch has OpenFlow protocol support for
OpenFlow meters. There is no implementation of meters in the Open
vSwitch software switch (neither the kernel-based nor userspace
switches).
VLANs
-----
Q: What's a VLAN?
A: At the simplest level, a VLAN (short for "virtual LAN") is a way to
partition a single switch into multiple switches. Suppose, for
example, that you have two groups of machines, group A and group B.
You want the machines in group A to be able to talk to each other,
and you want the machine in group B to be able to talk to each
other, but you don't want the machines in group A to be able to
talk to the machines in group B. You can do this with two
switches, by plugging the machines in group A into one switch and
the machines in group B into the other switch.
If you only have one switch, then you can use VLANs to do the same
thing, by configuring the ports for machines in group A as VLAN
"access ports" for one VLAN and the ports for group B as "access
ports" for a different VLAN. The switch will only forward packets
between ports that are assigned to the same VLAN, so this
effectively subdivides your single switch into two independent
switches, one for each group of machines.
So far we haven't said anything about VLAN headers. With access
ports, like we've described so far, no VLAN header is present in
the Ethernet frame. This means that the machines (or switches)
connected to access ports need not be aware that VLANs are
involved, just like in the case where we use two different physical
switches.
Now suppose that you have a whole bunch of switches in your
network, instead of just one, and that some machines in group A are
connected directly to both switches 1 and 2. To allow these
machines to talk to each other, you could add an access port for
group A's VLAN to switch 1 and another to switch 2, and then
connect an Ethernet cable between those ports. That works fine,
but it doesn't scale well as the number of switches and the number
of VLANs increases, because you use up a lot of valuable switch
ports just connecting together your VLANs.
This is where VLAN headers come in. Instead of using one cable and
two ports per VLAN to connect a pair of switches, we configure a
port on each switch as a VLAN "trunk port". Packets sent and
received on a trunk port carry a VLAN header that says what VLAN
the packet belongs to, so that only two ports total are required to
connect the switches, regardless of the number of VLANs in use.
Normally, only switches (either physical or virtual) are connected
to a trunk port, not individual hosts, because individual hosts
don't expect to see a VLAN header in the traffic that they receive.
None of the above discussion says anything about particular VLAN
numbers. This is because VLAN numbers are completely arbitrary.
One must only ensure that a given VLAN is numbered consistently
throughout a network and that different VLANs are given different
numbers. (That said, VLAN 0 is usually synonymous with a packet
that has no VLAN header, and VLAN 4095 is reserved.)
Q: VLANs don't work.
A: Many drivers in Linux kernels before version 3.3 had VLAN-related
bugs. If you are having problems with VLANs that you suspect to be
driver related, then you have several options:
- Upgrade to Linux 3.3 or later.
- Build and install a fixed version of the particular driver
that is causing trouble, if one is available.
- Use a NIC whose driver does not have VLAN problems.
- Use "VLAN splinters", a feature in Open vSwitch 1.4 and later
that works around bugs in kernel drivers. To enable VLAN
splinters on interface eth0, use the command:
ovs-vsctl set interface eth0 other-config:enable-vlan-splinters=true
For VLAN splinters to be effective, Open vSwitch must know
which VLANs are in use. See the "VLAN splinters" section in
the Interface table in ovs-vswitchd.conf.db(5) for details on
how Open vSwitch infers in-use VLANs.
VLAN splinters increase memory use and reduce performance, so
use them only if needed.
- Apply the "vlan workaround" patch from the XenServer kernel
patch queue, build Open vSwitch against this patched kernel,
and then use ovs-vlan-bug-workaround(8) to enable the VLAN
workaround for each interface whose driver is buggy.
(This is a nontrivial exercise, so this option is included
only for completeness.)
It is not always easy to tell whether a Linux kernel driver has
buggy VLAN support. The ovs-vlan-test(8) and ovs-test(8) utilities
can help you test. See their manpages for details. Of the two
utilities, ovs-test(8) is newer and more thorough, but
ovs-vlan-test(8) may be easier to use.
Q: VLANs still don't work. I've tested the driver so I know that it's OK.
A: Do you have VLANs enabled on the physical switch that OVS is
attached to? Make sure that the port is configured to trunk the
VLAN or VLANs that you are using with OVS.
Q: Outgoing VLAN-tagged traffic goes through OVS to my physical switch
and to its destination host, but OVS seems to drop incoming return
traffic.
A: It's possible that you have the VLAN configured on your physical
switch as the "native" VLAN. In this mode, the switch treats
incoming packets either tagged with the native VLAN or untagged as
part of the native VLAN. It may also send outgoing packets in the
native VLAN without a VLAN tag.
If this is the case, you have two choices:
- Change the physical switch port configuration to tag packets
it forwards to OVS with the native VLAN instead of forwarding
them untagged.
- Change the OVS configuration for the physical port to a
native VLAN mode. For example, the following sets up a
bridge with port eth0 in "native-tagged" mode in VLAN 9:
ovs-vsctl add-br br0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth0 tag=9 vlan_mode=native-tagged
In this situation, "native-untagged" mode will probably work
equally well. Refer to the documentation for the Port table
in ovs-vswitchd.conf.db(5) for more information.
Q: I added a pair of VMs on different VLANs, like this:
ovs-vsctl add-br br0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 tap0 tag=9
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 tap1 tag=10
but the VMs can't access each other, the external network, or the
Internet.
A: It is to be expected that the VMs can't access each other. VLANs
are a means to partition a network. When you configured tap0 and
tap1 as access ports for different VLANs, you indicated that they
should be isolated from each other.
As for the external network and the Internet, it seems likely that
the machines you are trying to access are not on VLAN 9 (or 10) and
that the Internet is not available on VLAN 9 (or 10).
Q: I added a pair of VMs on the same VLAN, like this:
ovs-vsctl add-br br0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 tap0 tag=9
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 tap1 tag=9
The VMs can access each other, but not the external network or the
Internet.
A: It seems likely that the machines you are trying to access in the
external network are not on VLAN 9 and that the Internet is not
available on VLAN 9. Also, ensure VLAN 9 is set up as an allowed
trunk VLAN on the upstream switch port to which eth0 is connected.
Q: Can I configure an IP address on a VLAN?
A: Yes. Use an "internal port" configured as an access port. For
example, the following configures IP address 192.168.0.7 on VLAN 9.
That is, OVS will forward packets from eth0 to 192.168.0.7 only if
they have an 802.1Q header with VLAN 9. Conversely, traffic
forwarded from 192.168.0.7 to eth0 will be tagged with an 802.1Q
header with VLAN 9:
ovs-vsctl add-br br0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 vlan9 tag=9 -- set interface vlan9 type=internal
ifconfig vlan9 192.168.0.7
See also the following question.
Q: I configured one IP address on VLAN 0 and another on VLAN 9, like
this:
ovs-vsctl add-br br0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth0
ifconfig br0 192.168.0.5
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 vlan9 tag=9 -- set interface vlan9 type=internal
ifconfig vlan9 192.168.0.9
but other hosts that are only on VLAN 0 can reach the IP address
configured on VLAN 9. What's going on?
A: RFC 1122 section 3.3.4.2 "Multihoming Requirements" describes two
approaches to IP address handling in Internet hosts:
- In the "Strong ES Model", where an ES is a host ("End
System"), an IP address is primarily associated with a
particular interface. The host discards packets that arrive
on interface A if they are destined for an IP address that is
configured on interface B. The host never sends packets from
interface A using a source address configured on interface B.
- In the "Weak ES Model", an IP address is primarily associated
with a host. The host accepts packets that arrive on any
interface if they are destined for any of the host's IP
addresses, even if the address is configured on some
interface other than the one on which it arrived. The host
does not restrict itself to sending packets from an IP
address associated with the originating interface.
Linux uses the weak ES model. That means that when packets
destined to the VLAN 9 IP address arrive on eth0 and are bridged to
br0, the kernel IP stack accepts them there for the VLAN 9 IP
address, even though they were not received on vlan9, the network
device for vlan9.
To simulate the strong ES model on Linux, one may add iptables rule
to filter packets based on source and destination address and
adjust ARP configuration with sysctls.
BSD uses the strong ES model.
Q: My OpenFlow controller doesn't see the VLANs that I expect.
A: The configuration for VLANs in the Open vSwitch database (e.g. via
ovs-vsctl) only affects traffic that goes through Open vSwitch's
implementation of the OpenFlow "normal switching" action. By
default, when Open vSwitch isn't connected to a controller and
nothing has been manually configured in the flow table, all traffic
goes through the "normal switching" action. But, if you set up
OpenFlow flows on your own, through a controller or using ovs-ofctl
or through other means, then you have to implement VLAN handling
yourself.
You can use "normal switching" as a component of your OpenFlow
actions, e.g. by putting "normal" into the lists of actions on
ovs-ofctl or by outputting to OFPP_NORMAL from an OpenFlow
controller. In situations where this is not suitable, you can
implement VLAN handling yourself, e.g.:
- If a packet comes in on an access port, and the flow table
needs to send it out on a trunk port, then the flow can add
the appropriate VLAN tag with the "mod_vlan_vid" action.
- If a packet comes in on a trunk port, and the flow table
needs to send it out on an access port, then the flow can
strip the VLAN tag with the "strip_vlan" action.
Q: I configured ports on a bridge as access ports with different VLAN
tags, like this:
ovs-vsctl add-br br0
ovs-vsctl set-controller br0 tcp:192.168.0.10:6633
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 tap0 tag=9
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 tap1 tag=10
but the VMs running behind tap0 and tap1 can still communicate,
that is, they are not isolated from each other even though they are
on different VLANs.
A: Do you have a controller configured on br0 (as the commands above
do)? If so, then this is a variant on the previous question, "My
OpenFlow controller doesn't see the VLANs that I expect," and you
can refer to the answer there for more information.
VXLANs
-----
Q: What's a VXLAN?
A: VXLAN stands for Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network, and is a means
to solve the scaling challenges of VLAN networks in a multi-tenant
environment. VXLAN is an overlay network which transports an L2 network
over an existing L3 network. For more information on VXLAN, please see
the IETF draft available here:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mahalingam-dutt-dcops-vxlan-03
Q: How much of the VXLAN protocol does Open vSwitch currently support?
A: Open vSwitch currently supports the framing format for packets on the
wire. There is currently no support for the multicast aspects of VXLAN.
To get around the lack of multicast support, it is possible to
pre-provision MAC to IP address mappings either manually or from a
controller.
Q: What destination UDP port does the VXLAN implementation in Open vSwitch
use?
A: By default, Open vSwitch will use the assigned IANA port for VXLAN, which
is 4789. However, it is possible to configure the destination UDP port
manually on a per-VXLAN tunnel basis. An example of this configuration is
provided below.
ovs-vsctl add-br br0
ovs-vsctl add-port br0 vxlan1 -- set interface vxlan1
type=vxlan options:remote_ip=192.168.1.2 options:key=flow
options:dst_port=8472
Using OpenFlow (Manually or Via Controller)
-------------------------------------------
Q: What versions of OpenFlow does Open vSwitch support?
A: The following table lists the versions of OpenFlow supported by
each version of Open vSwitch:
Open vSwitch OF1.0 OF1.1 OF1.2 OF1.3 OF1.4 OF1.5
=============== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== =====
1.9 and earlier yes --- --- --- --- ---
1.10 yes --- [*] [*] --- ---
1.11 yes --- [*] [*] --- ---
2.0 yes [*] [*] [*] --- ---
2.1 yes [*] [*] [*] --- ---
2.2 yes [*] [*] [*] [%] [*]
2.3 yes yes yes yes [*] [*]
[*] Supported, with one or more missing features.
[%] Experimental, unsafe implementation.
Open vSwitch 2.3 enables OpenFlow 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 by default
in ovs-vswitchd. In Open vSwitch 1.10 through 2.2, OpenFlow 1.1,
1.2, and 1.3 must be enabled manually in ovs-vswitchd. OpenFlow
1.4 and 1.5 are also supported, with missing features, in Open
vSwitch 2.3 and later, but not enabled by default. In any case,
the user may override the default:
- To enable OpenFlow 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 on bridge br0:
ovs-vsctl set bridge br0 protocols=OpenFlow10,OpenFlow11,OpenFlow12,OpenFlow13
- To enable OpenFlow 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5 on bridge br0:
ovs-vsctl set bridge br0 protocols=OpenFlow10,OpenFlow11,OpenFlow12,OpenFlow13,OpenFlow14,OpenFlow15
- To enable only OpenFlow 1.0 on bridge br0:
ovs-vsctl set bridge br0 protocols=OpenFlow10
All current versions of ovs-ofctl enable only OpenFlow 1.0 by
default. Use the -O option to enable support for later versions of
OpenFlow in ovs-ofctl. For example:
ovs-ofctl -O OpenFlow13 dump-flows br0
(Open vSwitch 2.2 had an experimental implementation of OpenFlow
1.4 that could cause crashes. We don't recommend enabling it.)
OPENFLOW-1.1+ in the Open vSwitch source tree tracks support for
OpenFlow 1.1 and later features. When support for OpenFlow 1.4 and
1.5 is solidly implemented, Open vSwitch will enable those version
by default. Also, the OpenFlow 1.5 specification is still under
development and thus subject to change.
Q: Does Open vSwitch support MPLS?
A: Before version 1.11, Open vSwitch did not support MPLS. That is,
these versions can match on MPLS Ethernet types, but they cannot
match, push, or pop MPLS labels, nor can they look past MPLS labels
into the encapsulated packet.
Open vSwitch versions 1.11, 2.0, and 2.1 have very minimal support
for MPLS. With the userspace datapath only, these versions can
match, push, or pop a single MPLS label, but they still cannot look
past MPLS labels (even after popping them) into the encapsulated
packet. Kernel datapath support is unchanged from earlier
versions.
Open vSwitch version 2.2 will be able to match, push, or pop up to
3 MPLS labels. Looking past MPLS labels into the encapsulated
packet will still be unsupported. Both userspace and kernel
datapaths will be supported, but MPLS processing always happens in
userspace either way, so kernel datapath performance will be
disappointing.
Q: I'm getting "error type 45250 code 0". What's that?
A: This is a Open vSwitch extension to OpenFlow error codes. Open
vSwitch uses this extension when it must report an error to an
OpenFlow controller but no standard OpenFlow error code is
suitable.
Open vSwitch logs the errors that it sends to controllers, so the
easiest thing to do is probably to look at the ovs-vswitchd log to
find out what the error was.
If you want to dissect the extended error message yourself, the
format is documented in include/openflow/nicira-ext.h in the Open
vSwitch source distribution. The extended error codes are
documented in lib/ofp-errors.h.
Q1: Some of the traffic that I'd expect my OpenFlow controller to see
doesn't actually appear through the OpenFlow connection, even
though I know that it's going through.
Q2: Some of the OpenFlow flows that my controller sets up don't seem
to apply to certain traffic, especially traffic between OVS and
the controller itself.
A: By default, Open vSwitch assumes that OpenFlow controllers are
connected "in-band", that is, that the controllers are actually
part of the network that is being controlled. In in-band mode,
Open vSwitch sets up special "hidden" flows to make sure that
traffic can make it back and forth between OVS and the controllers.
These hidden flows are higher priority than any flows that can be
set up through OpenFlow, and they are not visible through normal
OpenFlow flow table dumps.
Usually, the hidden flows are desirable and helpful, but
occasionally they can cause unexpected behavior. You can view the
full OpenFlow flow table, including hidden flows, on bridge br0
with the command:
ovs-appctl bridge/dump-flows br0
to help you debug. The hidden flows are those with priorities
greater than 65535 (the maximum priority that can be set with
OpenFlow).
The DESIGN file at the top level of the Open vSwitch source
distribution describes the in-band model in detail.
If your controllers are not actually in-band (e.g. they are on
localhost via 127.0.0.1, or on a separate network), then you should
configure your controllers in "out-of-band" mode. If you have one
controller on bridge br0, then you can configure out-of-band mode
on it with:
ovs-vsctl set controller br0 connection-mode=out-of-band
Q: I configured all my controllers for out-of-band control mode but
"ovs-appctl bridge/dump-flows" still shows some hidden flows.
A: You probably have a remote manager configured (e.g. with "ovs-vsctl
set-manager"). By default, Open vSwitch assumes that managers need
in-band rules set up on every bridge. You can disable these rules
on bridge br0 with:
ovs-vsctl set bridge br0 other-config:disable-in-band=true
This actually disables in-band control entirely for the bridge, as
if all the bridge's controllers were configured for out-of-band
control.
Q: My OpenFlow controller doesn't see the VLANs that I expect.
A: See answer under "VLANs", above.
Q: I ran "ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 nw_dst=192.168.0.1,actions=drop"
but I got a funny message like this:
ofp_util|INFO|normalization changed ofp_match, details:
ofp_util|INFO| pre: nw_dst=192.168.0.1
ofp_util|INFO|post:
and when I ran "ovs-ofctl dump-flows br0" I saw that my nw_dst
match had disappeared, so that the flow ends up matching every
packet.
A: The term "normalization" in the log message means that a flow
cannot match on an L3 field without saying what L3 protocol is in
use. The "ovs-ofctl" command above didn't specify an L3 protocol,
so the L3 field match was dropped.
In this case, the L3 protocol could be IP or ARP. A correct
command for each possibility is, respectively:
ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 ip,nw_dst=192.168.0.1,actions=drop
and
ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 arp,nw_dst=192.168.0.1,actions=drop
Similarly, a flow cannot match on an L4 field without saying what
L4 protocol is in use. For example, the flow match "tp_src=1234"
is, by itself, meaningless and will be ignored. Instead, to match
TCP source port 1234, write "tcp,tp_src=1234", or to match UDP
source port 1234, write "udp,tp_src=1234".
Q: How can I figure out the OpenFlow port number for a given port?
A: The OFPT_FEATURES_REQUEST message requests an OpenFlow switch to
respond with an OFPT_FEATURES_REPLY that, among other information,
includes a mapping between OpenFlow port names and numbers. From a
command prompt, "ovs-ofctl show br0" makes such a request and
prints the response for switch br0.
The Interface table in the Open vSwitch database also maps OpenFlow
port names to numbers. To print the OpenFlow port number
associated with interface eth0, run:
ovs-vsctl get Interface eth0 ofport
You can print the entire mapping with:
ovs-vsctl -- --columns=name,ofport list Interface
but the output mixes together interfaces from all bridges in the
database, so it may be confusing if more than one bridge exists.
In the Open vSwitch database, ofport value -1 means that the
interface could not be created due to an error. (The Open vSwitch
log should indicate the reason.) ofport value [] (the empty set)
means that the interface hasn't been created yet. The latter is
normally an intermittent condition (unless ovs-vswitchd is not
running).
Q: I added some flows with my controller or with ovs-ofctl, but when I
run "ovs-dpctl dump-flows" I don't see them.
A: ovs-dpctl queries a kernel datapath, not an OpenFlow switch. It
won't display the information that you want. You want to use
"ovs-ofctl dump-flows" instead.
Q: It looks like each of the interfaces in my bonded port shows up
as an individual OpenFlow port. Is that right?
A: Yes, Open vSwitch makes individual bond interfaces visible as
OpenFlow ports, rather than the bond as a whole. The interfaces
are treated together as a bond for only a few purposes:
- Sending a packet to the OFPP_NORMAL port. (When an OpenFlow
controller is not configured, this happens implicitly to
every packet.)
- Mirrors configured for output to a bonded port.
It would make a lot of sense for Open vSwitch to present a bond as
a single OpenFlow port. If you want to contribute an
implementation of such a feature, please bring it up on the Open
vSwitch development mailing list at dev@openvswitch.org.
Q: I have a sophisticated network setup involving Open vSwitch, VMs or
multiple hosts, and other components. The behavior isn't what I
expect. Help!
A: To debug network behavior problems, trace the path of a packet,
hop-by-hop, from its origin in one host to a remote host. If
that's correct, then trace the path of the response packet back to
the origin.
Usually a simple ICMP echo request and reply ("ping") packet is
good enough. Start by initiating an ongoing "ping" from the origin
host to a remote host. If you are tracking down a connectivity
problem, the "ping" will not display any successful output, but
packets are still being sent. (In this case the packets being sent
are likely ARP rather than ICMP.)
Tools available for tracing include the following:
- "tcpdump" and "wireshark" for observing hops across network
devices, such as Open vSwitch internal devices and physical
wires.
- "ovs-appctl dpif/dump-flows <br>" in Open vSwitch 1.10 and
later or "ovs-dpctl dump-flows <br>" in earlier versions.
These tools allow one to observe the actions being taken on
packets in ongoing flows.
See ovs-vswitchd(8) for "ovs-appctl dpif/dump-flows"
documentation, ovs-dpctl(8) for "ovs-dpctl dump-flows"
documentation, and "Why are there so many different ways to
dump flows?" above for some background.
- "ovs-appctl ofproto/trace" to observe the logic behind how
ovs-vswitchd treats packets. See ovs-vswitchd(8) for
documentation. You can out more details about a given flow
that "ovs-dpctl dump-flows" displays, by cutting and pasting
a flow from the output into an "ovs-appctl ofproto/trace"
command.
- SPAN, RSPAN, and ERSPAN features of physical switches, to
observe what goes on at these physical hops.
Starting at the origin of a given packet, observe the packet at
each hop in turn. For example, in one plausible scenario, you
might:
1. "tcpdump" the "eth" interface through which an ARP egresses
a VM, from inside the VM.
2. "tcpdump" the "vif" or "tap" interface through which the ARP
ingresses the host machine.
3. Use "ovs-dpctl dump-flows" to spot the ARP flow and observe
the host interface through which the ARP egresses the
physical machine. You may need to use "ovs-dpctl show" to
interpret the port numbers. If the output seems surprising,
you can use "ovs-appctl ofproto/trace" to observe details of
how ovs-vswitchd determined the actions in the "ovs-dpctl
dump-flows" output.
4. "tcpdump" the "eth" interface through which the ARP egresses
the physical machine.
5. "tcpdump" the "eth" interface through which the ARP
ingresses the physical machine, at the remote host that
receives the ARP.
6. Use "ovs-dpctl dump-flows" to spot the ARP flow on the
remote host that receives the ARP and observe the VM "vif"
or "tap" interface to which the flow is directed. Again,
"ovs-dpctl show" and "ovs-appctl ofproto/trace" might help.
7. "tcpdump" the "vif" or "tap" interface to which the ARP is
directed.
8. "tcpdump" the "eth" interface through which the ARP
ingresses a VM, from inside the VM.
It is likely that during one of these steps you will figure out the
problem. If not, then follow the ARP reply back to the origin, in
reverse.
Q: How do I make a flow drop packets?
A: To drop a packet is to receive it without forwarding it. OpenFlow
explicitly specifies forwarding actions. Thus, a flow with an
empty set of actions does not forward packets anywhere, causing
them to be dropped. You can specify an empty set of actions with
"actions=" on the ovs-ofctl command line. For example:
ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 priority=65535,actions=
would cause every packet entering switch br0 to be dropped.
You can write "drop" explicitly if you like. The effect is the
same. Thus, the following command also causes every packet
entering switch br0 to be dropped:
ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 priority=65535,actions=drop
"drop" is not an action, either in OpenFlow or Open vSwitch.
Rather, it is only a way to say that there are no actions.
Q: I added a flow to send packets out the ingress port, like this:
ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 in_port=2,actions=2
but OVS drops the packets instead.
A: Yes, OpenFlow requires a switch to ignore attempts to send a packet
out its ingress port. The rationale is that dropping these packets
makes it harder to loop the network. Sometimes this behavior can
even be convenient, e.g. it is often the desired behavior in a flow
that forwards a packet to several ports ("floods" the packet).
Sometimes one really needs to send a packet out its ingress port
("hairpin"). In this case, output to OFPP_IN_PORT, which in
ovs-ofctl syntax is expressed as just "in_port", e.g.:
ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 in_port=2,actions=in_port
This also works in some circumstances where the flow doesn't match
on the input port. For example, if you know that your switch has
five ports numbered 2 through 6, then the following will send every
received packet out every port, even its ingress port:
ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 actions=2,3,4,5,6,in_port
or, equivalently:
ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 actions=all,in_port
Sometimes, in complicated flow tables with multiple levels of
"resubmit" actions, a flow needs to output to a particular port
that may or may not be the ingress port. It's difficult to take
advantage of OFPP_IN_PORT in this situation. To help, Open vSwitch
provides, as an OpenFlow extension, the ability to modify the
in_port field. Whatever value is currently in the in_port field is
the port to which outputs will be dropped, as well as the
destination for OFPP_IN_PORT. This means that the following will
reliably output to port 2 or to ports 2 through 6, respectively:
ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 in_port=2,actions=load:0->NXM_OF_IN_PORT[],2
ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 actions=load:0->NXM_OF_IN_PORT[],2,3,4,5,6
If the input port is important, then one may save and restore it on
the stack:
ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 actions=push:NXM_OF_IN_PORT[],\
load:0->NXM_OF_IN_PORT[],\
2,3,4,5,6,\
pop:NXM_OF_IN_PORT[]
Q: My bridge br0 has host 192.168.0.1 on port 1 and host 192.168.0.2
on port 2. I set up flows to forward only traffic destined to the
other host and drop other traffic, like this:
priority=5,in_port=1,ip,nw_dst=192.168.0.2,actions=2
priority=5,in_port=2,ip,nw_dst=192.168.0.1,actions=1
priority=0,actions=drop
But it doesn't work--I don't get any connectivity when I do this.
Why?
A: These flows drop the ARP packets that IP hosts use to establish IP
connectivity over Ethernet. To solve the problem, add flows to
allow ARP to pass between the hosts:
priority=5,in_port=1,arp,actions=2
priority=5,in_port=2,arp,actions=1
This issue can manifest other ways, too. The following flows that
match on Ethernet addresses instead of IP addresses will also drop
ARP packets, because ARP requests are broadcast instead of being
directed to a specific host:
priority=5,in_port=1,dl_dst=54:00:00:00:00:02,actions=2
priority=5,in_port=2,dl_dst=54:00:00:00:00:01,actions=1
priority=0,actions=drop
The solution already described above will also work in this case.
It may be better to add flows to allow all multicast and broadcast
traffic:
priority=5,in_port=1,dl_dst=01:00:00:00:00:00/01:00:00:00:00:00,actions=2
priority=5,in_port=2,dl_dst=01:00:00:00:00:00/01:00:00:00:00:00,actions=1
Development
-----------
Q: How do I implement a new OpenFlow message?
A: Add your new message to "enum ofpraw" and "enum ofptype" in
lib/ofp-msgs.h, following the existing pattern. Then recompile and
fix all of the new warnings, implementing new functionality for the
new message as needed. (If you configure with --enable-Werror, as
described in INSTALL, then it is impossible to miss any warnings.)
If you need to add an OpenFlow vendor extension message for a
vendor that doesn't yet have any extension messages, then you will
also need to edit build-aux/extract-ofp-msgs.
Contact
-------
bugs@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/
此处可能存在不合适展示的内容，页面不予展示。您可通过相关编辑功能自查并修改。
如您确认内容无涉及 不当用语 / 纯广告导流 / 暴力 / 低俗色情 / 侵权 / 盗版 / 虚假 / 无价值内容或违法国家有关法律法规的内容，可点击提交进行申诉，我们将尽快为您处理。
