From 8353d0d6a31042ba7c54696ef1ec59eb883d647f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhang Bo <oscar.zhangbo@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:37:08 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] block/nbd: Assert there are no timers when closed

Our two timers must not remain armed beyond nbd_clear_bdrvstate(), or
they will access freed data when they fire.

This patch is separate from the patches that actually fix the issue
(HEAD^^ and HEAD^) so that you can run the associated regression iotest
(281) on a configuration that reproducibly exposes the bug.

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Bo <oscar.zhangbo@huawei.com>
---
 block/nbd.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block/nbd.c b/block/nbd.c
index 5ff8a57314..dc6c3f3bbc 100644
--- a/block/nbd.c
+++ b/block/nbd.c
@@ -110,6 +110,10 @@ static void nbd_clear_bdrvstate(BlockDriverState *bs)
 
     yank_unregister_instance(BLOCKDEV_YANK_INSTANCE(bs->node_name));
 
+    /* Must not leave timers behind that would access freed data */
+    assert(!s->reconnect_delay_timer);
+    assert(!s->open_timer);
+
     object_unref(OBJECT(s->tlscreds));
     qapi_free_SocketAddress(s->saddr);
     s->saddr = NULL;
-- 
2.27.0